Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Discuss anything Morris Minor related.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
youngcamper
Minor Fan
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:34 pm
MMOC Member: No

Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by youngcamper »

Hi there,

I've just bought a project car last on the road in 1978. It is a late 1962 - 1963 model with distinctive features that prove this, it was first registered on 15 8 1963 but it doesn't have an A reg plate. Does anyone know why this might be?


Cheers.

Will
Will
ImageImageImage
________1967-Lily________________________1963-Phoebe_______________________1965-Dobby_________
MarkyB
Minor Maniac
Posts: 7845
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:18 pm
Location: South East London
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by MarkyB »

What reg does it have?
A regs are quite rare as not all licensing areas got up to speed at the same time.

It could be that the original number is a vanity plate now, and yours is age related.

"Once you break something you will see how it was put together"
youngcamper
Minor Fan
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:34 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by youngcamper »

reg is 659 FBE so obvioulsy the cars called phoebe, it doesn't seem like an age related plate too me?

How can I find out if its the original number?

Cheers,

Will
Will
ImageImageImage
________1967-Lily________________________1963-Phoebe_______________________1965-Dobby_________
alex_holden
Minor Legend
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Burnley
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by alex_holden »

My traveller is about the same age and has a similar number, nnn FBU (Oldham). FBE is Lincolnshire. Some areas kept on issuing non-age-related plates until 1964 or even 1965.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_re ... 0s_to_1982
http://www.motorcycle.co.uk/Reference-m ... tters.aspx
ImageImage
Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.
phurn
Minor Fan
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Birmingham
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by phurn »

yeah im lead to believe 66 was the firt year everywhere was forced to issue age plates. which makes the dissapointment of mine being xjy 67a (leeds i beleive?) all the greater, id love a 3 letter 3 number plate.
phurn
Minor Fan
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Birmingham
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by phurn »

also i think im right in saying it cant be age related as all age issued plates start ssk *** dont they? atleast the one on my old 100e did.
bpr81a
Minor Legend
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:59 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by bpr81a »

phurn wrote:yeah im lead to believe 66 was the firt year everywhere was forced to issue age plates.
1965 ('C' Plate) was the first compulsory suffix. A and B were only used where they'd run out of all their 'nnn XXX' numbers.

Some 'A' plates were used as an early type of Age related plate - my 62 saloon has an 'A' plate.

And no, not all Age related plates have 'SSK'. There are loads more than that.

Jon Rocke
phurn
Minor Fan
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Birmingham
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by phurn »

ah seems i was wrong then..... would i atleast be right in sayign that ssk was reserved for age related plates, therefore all ssk's are an age plate rather than original registration?
yellowbelly
Minor Friendly
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Chesterfield
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by yellowbelly »

I took an avid interest in number plates from my own area (Lindsey) which includes the towns of Scunthorpe, Gainsborough and Barton upon Humber. Any car bought new in these areas would have had the BE as part of its registration. The last issued sequence I can remember being released would have been HBE in 1964 which would have been prefixed by 3 numbers. In Lincolnshire (Lindsey, Kesteven and Holland) I cannot remember any car at all with the A suffix, a few did have the B suffix but none in Lindsey and all in Lincolnshire had the C suffix when it became compulsory.
Paul
[color=#0000FF][img] :D :) [b][/b][/img][/color]
Sidney'61
Minor Legend
Posts: 1550
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:35 pm
Location: Northampton
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by Sidney'61 »

phurn wrote:ah seems i was wrong then..... would i atleast be right in sayign that ssk was reserved for age related plates, therefore all ssk's are an age plate rather than original registration?
All SK's will be age related plates (apart from ASK) as are all SJ and SL, also ones starting in UX are quite common replacements.http://www.fleetdata.co.uk/agerelated.html (I have a UXR and a CSJ at home!)
My blue car was registered in march 1963, although it now has an age-related A reg plate it was originally 5190 PJ. It just depends on whether the particular district had any non-suffixed plates they wished to use up before starting on A-reg.
Andy W____________1961 2-door 948cc (Sidney)_____________1963 2-door 1275cc (Emily)_______

mike.perry
Series MM Registrar
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Reading
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by mike.perry »

There is a list of registration letter allocations on the Series MM website http://seriesmm.mmoc.org.uk Car Ident
[sig]3580[/sig]
youngcamper
Minor Fan
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:34 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: Why doesn't my 1963 car have an A reg?

Post by youngcamper »

Thanks Chaps that explains it all.

I was worried it had been ringed or something.

Will
Will
ImageImageImage
________1967-Lily________________________1963-Phoebe_______________________1965-Dobby_________
Post Reply