Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Discuss anything Morris Minor related.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
carlosramalho
Minor Addict
Posts: 594
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:20 am
Location: Lisbon
MMOC Member: No

Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by carlosramalho »

Hi All,

Sorry, May be I will do a silly question! But we are in silly season, so my question is:

What are the diferences between low and hight compression engine?
Cheers
Carlos
MM Lowlight 1949 - Portuguese Registration
Traveller 1964 - formerly AKR 343 B
Convertible1969 - formerly XCH 455 G
Pickup 1971 - formerly BTT 213 K
MMOC 66138
MORRIS MINOR is Forever also in Portugal
chrisryder
Minor Legend
Posts: 2217
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:44 pm
Location: West Midlands UK
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by chrisryder »

What do you want to know?

How to identify one from the other?

What makes one low compression and one high compression?

What the difference in performance is?
carlosramalho
Minor Addict
Posts: 594
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:20 am
Location: Lisbon
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by carlosramalho »

chrisryder wrote:What do you want to know?

How to identify one from the other?

What makes one low compression and one high compression?

What the difference in performance is?
Hi chrisryder,
I would Like to know All!
I' m complet New about this matter! For that reason I did this question!
Cheers
Carlos
MM Lowlight 1949 - Portuguese Registration
Traveller 1964 - formerly AKR 343 B
Convertible1969 - formerly XCH 455 G
Pickup 1971 - formerly BTT 213 K
MMOC 66138
MORRIS MINOR is Forever also in Portugal
JOWETTJAVELIN
Minor Legend
Posts: 2775
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: LANCASHIRE (paradise)
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by JOWETTJAVELIN »

Low comp. will give a very low output and thus less performance (probably better on fuel), and will run on almost anything. Paraffin, 2 star, white spirit, moonshine - you name it.

The higher the comp. ratio the better the grade of fuel needed to give better performance and prevent 'knocking'.

P.S. what is this silly season you speak of? I'm intrigued...
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by bmcecosse »

One has low compression = lower power and HEAVIER fuel consumption if asked to run the car at the same speed as an engine with high compression - which has more power and better fuel economy. The Low CR engines were designed to run on cheaper low octane fuel - (POOL Petrol) - this no longer available - so a higher CR takes advantage of today's higher Octane fuels and gives better efficiency and is therefore the way to go. However - the CR we talk of is the 'Volumetric Compression Ratio' - and what actually matters is the 'Barometric Compression Ratio' which is the ratio of the pressure in the cylinder at TDC over the pressure at BDC ! This depends on both the VCR and the efficiency with which the engine can 'breathe' in air..... So my mates 911T has a VCR of only 8:1 - but thanks to good head/valve/inlet manifold design and triple downdraft IDA Webers - it goes like sh!t off a shovel! :lol:
ImageImage
Image
lambrettalad
Minor Legend
Posts: 2865
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 3:15 pm
Location: Birmingham THE Second City & home of Aston Villa
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by lambrettalad »

bmc
hope you didn't cook your eggs and bacon on that shovel :D
Cheers Alex
all thoughts are given in good faith but..." You pays your money and takes your choice"


[/color]
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by bmcecosse »

Not me - vegetarian! But i believe in the old days - the footplate crew cooked their breakfast first - and then used the shovel for other essential duties later........
ImageImage
Image
mike.perry
Series MM Registrar
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Reading
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by mike.perry »

A high comp A Series engine would have almost flat top pistons, a low comp engine would have dished pistons. The engines can be identified by H or L in the engine number. L.C. engines were used for LCVs, military vehicles and marine engines.
The side valve engine was built to run on low octane fuel with flat top pistons and a 6.7 : 1 CR. It is necessary to skim the head to raise the CR
Last edited by mike.perry on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[sig]3580[/sig]
carlosramalho
Minor Addict
Posts: 594
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:20 am
Location: Lisbon
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by carlosramalho »

My question, was because my Morris Oxforf series. IV -1958 is a LC engine!
What you think about this? The engine is a 1500cc.
Cheers
Carlos
MM Lowlight 1949 - Portuguese Registration
Traveller 1964 - formerly AKR 343 B
Convertible1969 - formerly XCH 455 G
Pickup 1971 - formerly BTT 213 K
MMOC 66138
MORRIS MINOR is Forever also in Portugal
JOWETTJAVELIN
Minor Legend
Posts: 2775
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: LANCASHIRE (paradise)
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by JOWETTJAVELIN »

It simply means that your Oxford will run on cheaper grades of fuel but will be quite slow. BMC generally fitted LC engines to export cars.
liammonty
Minor Legend
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Dartmoor
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by liammonty »

One of my Minors (1968 2 door) has the original 1098 low comp engine (never rebuilt), and to be honest, it has as much power as most HC 1098 cars I've driven (and before anyone tells me otherwise, the engine is the correct one- some cars did have LC engines :wink: ). On paper it should be 5 bhp less, but I think the torque output is much the same. I suspect that there were bad ones and good ones of each engine type- tolerances back then weren't what they are now. I think to say that a car with a LC engine will be really slow is not necessarily true though.
JOWETTJAVELIN
Minor Legend
Posts: 2775
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: LANCASHIRE (paradise)
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by JOWETTJAVELIN »

What I would really like to see is a car with an original factory optional diesel engine, like a diesel Morris Oxford or Standard Vanguard. Those were the days when lorries and buses ran on petrol, so diesel engined cars are rare survivors.

I wonder what economy figures are and performance, bear in mind pre-turbo.

Was diesel an option on a Minor/A series?
chesney
Minor Legend
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:55 pm
Location: Le Tronquay, nr Bayeux, en France - Pop in for a cuppa!
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by chesney »

I think some diesel tractor engines were made, I remember a minor van had one, but he added a turbo to make it go up hills. Not sure how close it is to a conventional A series though..
MarkyB
Minor Maniac
Posts: 7845
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:18 pm
Location: South East London
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by MarkyB »

Was diesel an option on a Minor/A series?
I'm pretty sure they weren't an option, diesel engines then were very basic, heavy, noisy and smelly.
Not an attractive option.

"Once you break something you will see how it was put together"
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by bmcecosse »

The diesel A series is a hopeless thing - 18 bhp IIRC and at v low revs.........
ImageImage
Image
IaininTenbury
Minor Legend
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:09 am
Location: Worcestershire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by IaininTenbury »

Here's the tractor (BMC Mini) engine:[frame]Image[/frame]
And no not really suitable for a Minor, though that van with one fitted (was it in New Zealand or Australia?) appeals just down to the 'barking mad ness' off it :)
cheers
Iain
Fairmile Restorations.

'49 MM, '53 convertible, '55 van, and a '64 van.

Marina p.u., '56 Morris Isis Traveller, a '59 Morris JB van, a'66 J4 van, a '54 Land Rover, Land Rover 130, Renault 5, '36Railton, '35 Hudson, a Mk1 Transit and a Sherpa Camper...

A car can be restored at any time, but is only original once!
youngcamper
Minor Fan
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:34 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?

Post by youngcamper »

I guess If you were going to fit a diesel 948 to anything a A40 farina or a35 would be a better and lighter starting point
Will
ImageImageImage
________1967-Lily________________________1963-Phoebe_______________________1965-Dobby_________
Post Reply