"6" designation

Questions about History or requests for information (does anyone know where my car is now?) can go here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 8776
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by les »

Damn, you've got to be up early to catch these daring posts before they get removed! :evil:

POMMReg
Minor Legend
Posts: 3023
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Gloucester
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by POMMReg »

RussLCV wrote:yes to 6 and 5! a number on the Minor LCV Register listing
Which country assembled the "6" please, Russ?

What type of chassis plate and whether firewall stamped and whereabouts?

Ta
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Upon checking the entire register today it would appear the 2 x designation 6 entries were made by my predecessor and clearly should read as 5.
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

POMMReg
Minor Legend
Posts: 3023
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Gloucester
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by POMMReg »

Thanks

So no "6" on LCVs?

Interesting to see what Scandinavia used....
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Sweden were RHD and were the last country to change to LHD

Norway early LCVs were designate 3 (LHD) small numbers

Denmark seems to be the same the early DOMI van splitscreen was a designate 3 so it seems even the main importer did not assemble?
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

POMMReg
Minor Legend
Posts: 3023
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Gloucester
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by POMMReg »

Thanks.

So, despite "6" being given as a Minor vin prefix, in reality, was never used, just "53"?!
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

not what I said..............early LCVs to Scandinavia are shown as xxx3 not xxx53, that what out less inferior records to yours say
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

POMMReg
Minor Legend
Posts: 3023
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Gloucester
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by POMMReg »

What would a Scandinavian CKD LCV be?

Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?

What about the passenger varients?

Would of thought painting a vehicle in bits slightly impractical - let alone paint chips when the bits are removed from the crate the other end - anyone else question the "6" designation?
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

[quote="POMMReg"]What would a Scandinavian CKD LCV be?

Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?

3 (LHD) no mention of CKD in any early LCVs mentioned in Scandinavia even early series 11 DOMI conversion is not listed as CKD but carries OGH 35 confirming primer so was 6 used! as you would have thought this one would have been CKD photo copyright not for reposting/reuse
Image
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Some LCVs produced in Holland too...............none listed but they would have been CKDs possibly 6
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Confirmation of a LCV designation 6..................been checking my own records Chile used 6
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

POMMReg
Minor Legend
Posts: 3023
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Gloucester
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by POMMReg »

Presumably a single "6"? Is it a post '57?

Still doesn't explain " 53" - what, roughly is the chassis number(?) - perhaps the "6" was only introduced on single digit 948cc's?

Please contact the owner of that "OG" LCV - finally clear up EVERY UK built Minor id prefix.
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Perhaps a 'thanks you' is in order or was it just the way I was brought up!

2 x '6' in my notes both Chile
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 8776
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by les »

----I thought we had achieved a breakthrough. :-? It was going oh so well!

busguy
Minor Addict
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
Location: West Sussex UK
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by busguy »

les wrote:----I thought we had achieved a breakthrough. :-? It was going oh so well!
So did I! I thought there was hope, .......... then there was none .................. or not a lot!
Chris, say thank you to that nice man that has helped you with your information, and Russ, just try and understand 'Chris on a mission' a little better while bridges are built.
If both sides actually build and nurture this relationship, then it is win win for both these dedicated minor guys, and for all minor owners.
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 8776
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by les »

To be fair, Chris has been saying please and thanks in most of his posts, however let's hope this cooperation will continue as both parties have a good combined knowledge of our vehicles, which I'm sure we all value. :D

busguy
Minor Addict
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
Location: West Sussex UK
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by busguy »

RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.
RussLCV
Minor Legend
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Cardiff WALES
MMOC Member: No

Re: "6" designation

Post by RussLCV »

busguy wrote:
RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.
Very patronising comments
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk

busguy
Minor Addict
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
Location: West Sussex UK
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: "6" designation

Post by busguy »

RussLCV wrote:
busguy wrote:
RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.
Very patronising comments
Next thing, you will be arrogantly and patronisingly advising me to say 'thank you' for you 'putting me right' on the matter! :roll:
Post Reply