"6" designation
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Re: "6" designation
Damn, you've got to be up early to catch these daring posts before they get removed!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
- Location: Gloucester
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Which country assembled the "6" please, Russ?RussLCV wrote:yes to 6 and 5! a number on the Minor LCV Register listing
What type of chassis plate and whether firewall stamped and whereabouts?
Ta
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Upon checking the entire register today it would appear the 2 x designation 6 entries were made by my predecessor and clearly should read as 5.
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
- Location: Gloucester
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Thanks
So no "6" on LCVs?
Interesting to see what Scandinavia used....
So no "6" on LCVs?
Interesting to see what Scandinavia used....
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Sweden were RHD and were the last country to change to LHD
Norway early LCVs were designate 3 (LHD) small numbers
Denmark seems to be the same the early DOMI van splitscreen was a designate 3 so it seems even the main importer did not assemble?
Norway early LCVs were designate 3 (LHD) small numbers
Denmark seems to be the same the early DOMI van splitscreen was a designate 3 so it seems even the main importer did not assemble?
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
- Location: Gloucester
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Thanks.
So, despite "6" being given as a Minor vin prefix, in reality, was never used, just "53"?!
So, despite "6" being given as a Minor vin prefix, in reality, was never used, just "53"?!
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
not what I said..............early LCVs to Scandinavia are shown as xxx3 not xxx53, that what out less inferior records to yours say
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
- Location: Gloucester
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
What would a Scandinavian CKD LCV be?
Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?
What about the passenger varients?
Would of thought painting a vehicle in bits slightly impractical - let alone paint chips when the bits are removed from the crate the other end - anyone else question the "6" designation?
Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?
What about the passenger varients?
Would of thought painting a vehicle in bits slightly impractical - let alone paint chips when the bits are removed from the crate the other end - anyone else question the "6" designation?
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
[quote="POMMReg"]What would a Scandinavian CKD LCV be?
Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?
3 (LHD) no mention of CKD in any early LCVs mentioned in Scandinavia even early series 11 DOMI conversion is not listed as CKD but carries OGH 35 confirming primer so was 6 used! as you would have thought this one would have been CKD photo copyright not for reposting/reuse
Have a few "53s" listed, so was the 2nd "3" relevant to LHD, rather than paint type - which wouldn't be used as vehicle supplied unpainted?
3 (LHD) no mention of CKD in any early LCVs mentioned in Scandinavia even early series 11 DOMI conversion is not listed as CKD but carries OGH 35 confirming primer so was 6 used! as you would have thought this one would have been CKD photo copyright not for reposting/reuse
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Some LCVs produced in Holland too...............none listed but they would have been CKDs possibly 6
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Confirmation of a LCV designation 6..................been checking my own records Chile used 6
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:17 pm
- Location: Gloucester
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Presumably a single "6"? Is it a post '57?
Still doesn't explain " 53" - what, roughly is the chassis number(?) - perhaps the "6" was only introduced on single digit 948cc's?
Please contact the owner of that "OG" LCV - finally clear up EVERY UK built Minor id prefix.
Still doesn't explain " 53" - what, roughly is the chassis number(?) - perhaps the "6" was only introduced on single digit 948cc's?
Please contact the owner of that "OG" LCV - finally clear up EVERY UK built Minor id prefix.
Further investigations uncovered it was an inside job!!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Perhaps a 'thanks you' is in order or was it just the way I was brought up!
2 x '6' in my notes both Chile
2 x '6' in my notes both Chile
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
- Location: West Sussex UK
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: "6" designation
So did I! I thought there was hope, .......... then there was none .................. or not a lot!les wrote:----I thought we had achieved a breakthrough. It was going oh so well!
Chris, say thank you to that nice man that has helped you with your information, and Russ, just try and understand 'Chris on a mission' a little better while bridges are built.
If both sides actually build and nurture this relationship, then it is win win for both these dedicated minor guys, and for all minor owners.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Re: "6" designation
To be fair, Chris has been saying please and thanks in most of his posts, however let's hope this cooperation will continue as both parties have a good combined knowledge of our vehicles, which I'm sure we all value.
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
- Location: West Sussex UK
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: "6" designation
Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Cardiff WALES
- MMOC Member: No
Re: "6" designation
Very patronising commentsbusguy wrote:Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about
Russell Harvey
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
Minor LCV Register Historian
Freelance Motoring Journalist
http://www.Minorlcvreg.co.uk
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:06 pm
- Location: West Sussex UK
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: "6" designation
Next thing, you will be arrogantly and patronisingly advising me to say 'thank you' for you 'putting me right' on the matter!RussLCV wrote:Very patronising commentsbusguy wrote:Not being patronising. Entitled to comment, and did.RussLCV wrote:Not sure that patronising from you Busguy really helps a situation that you probably know nothing about