SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Discuss other problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
John Naylor
Minor Fan
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:19 pm
Location: WHITSTABLE KENT
MMOC Member: No

SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by John Naylor »

An official report from the Ministry of Transport, Driving & Vision Section, has emphasised the requirement for making sure that visibility must be maintained through the windscreens of all vehicles.
New items on the MOT test from the first of next month will hit owners and drivers of split screen cars hard, by decreeing that the centre pillar of the windscreen: "constitutes an obstruction and must therefore be removed." Quoted directly from Minor Matters Vol XV No.5 Mar/Apr 1994.
They go on to discuss the use of perspex centre pillars.
In Minor Matters Vol XV No.6 May/ Jun 1994 they remind readers of the No.5 April 1st publish date but apparently many splitty owners were not amused!
I have been wading through a pile of ancient Minor Matters and there are some pretty good articles. Will pass the lot on when I have finished reading them. Perhaps room for a regular '25 years ago' piece in future Minor Matters?
(Hope no splitty owners choked on their corn flakes reading this).
John

Bertie.
amgrave
Minor Addict
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 3:26 pm
Location: North Kent
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by amgrave »

Does this mean we might have to fit transparent windscreen wipers and arms in the future???????????????? :lol: :lol: :lol:

martin418
Minor Fan
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:54 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by martin418 »

just simply remove the screen plus cheap air con and saving money on wiper blades !!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
simmitc
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4729
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Essex
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by simmitc »

Great article. The worrying thing is that it sounds so absolutely right, and exactly what the dreaded Eurocrats might do :evil:
MarkyB
Minor Maniac
Posts: 7845
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:18 pm
Location: South East London
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by MarkyB »

Will they ban fluffy dice and air fresheners too?

"Once you break something you will see how it was put together"
mike.perry
Series MM Registrar
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Reading
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by mike.perry »

As split screens do not need an MOT - no problem :)
[sig]3580[/sig]
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Shropshire/Sussex/Cumbria
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by Matt »

Apparently neither will any other (non modified) minor from 2017
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
www.facebook.com/transitionclassics
simmitc
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4729
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Essex
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by simmitc »

More detail please...
mike.perry
Series MM Registrar
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Reading
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by mike.perry »

Save this one for April 1st
[sig]3580[/sig]
meh
Minor Friendly
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:47 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by meh »

panky
Minor Legend
Posts: 1997
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:12 pm
Location: Cheshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by panky »

It has been on the cards for a while but with more draconian stipulations rather than 'substantially changed', basically a car had to be absolutely bog standard - no modification at all (including tyres and lights) to qualify as historic. This sounds like a watering down of the requirements but I dread it coming in, hopefully it wont. Might sway my vote if there is a referendum on staying in the EU.
Image
SteveClem
Minor Legend
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:37 am
Location: Near Belper
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by SteveClem »

Funny this EU thing. Supposed to be about standardising things across Europe but obviously every country continues to do it's own thing regardless.
TvdWerf
Minor Addict
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:39 am
Location: Netherlands, Drenthe
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by TvdWerf »

The EU thing for the MOT is maybe better as in the link.
The new rules for us is going 50 years and younger, and a difference is there between old car from 30+ and real old-timers from 40+
The actual is older as 1-1-1960 is MOT free and tax free.
Even where they are running on: the very cheap rebuilt for Liquid Gas says you have to pay taxes, while the standard Moggy fuel is Tax free ;)
The problem was here for a while, a lot of old VW golf Diesels, and old Mercedes diesels were in use as daily transport, when they were 25+, so old smoking cars, who are not a real old-timer, were filling the old-timer shows.
People with older cars did not come any more, why park your MM between 2 1980 VW golf's?
Now this is over, only the really old-timer user is taking care for his old car ;)
MM '51 LHD sidevalve
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 8762
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by les »

panky wrote:It has been on the cards for a while but with more draconian stipulations rather than 'substantially changed', basically a car had to be absolutely bog standard - no modification at all (including tyres and lights) to qualify as historic. This sounds like a watering down of the requirements but I dread it coming in, hopefully it wont. Might sway my vote if there is a referendum on staying in the EU.
I read it as --not-'substantially modified'

panky
Minor Legend
Posts: 1997
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:12 pm
Location: Cheshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by panky »

The actual phrase is 'unless it has undergone “substantial change” from how it was when manufactured' but 'not substantially modified' is the same thing I guess.
Image
martin418
Minor Fan
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:54 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by martin418 »

do you think my m10 bolts holding my front panel on are a substantial modification :lol: :lol: :D
panky
Minor Legend
Posts: 1997
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:12 pm
Location: Cheshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by panky »

It's a dead give away if they're stainless :)
Image
martin418
Minor Fan
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:54 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by martin418 »

don't worry i have hidden the car in the garage in case vosa are monitoring this site and send a drone over to investigate :lol: :lol: :lol:
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Shropshire/Sussex/Cumbria
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by Matt »

VOSA no longer exist...

Now DVSA

I wonder where all our taxes go?
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
www.facebook.com/transitionclassics
Autobahn
Minor Friendly
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:15 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: SHOCK LEGISLATION FOR SPLIT SCREENS OWNERS

Post by Autobahn »

MarkyB wrote:Will they ban fluffy dice and air fresheners too?
They are banned already, many MOT stations will remove these to carry out the test or vehicle would fail.

Technically Sat Navs stuck to the windscreen also impede vision and are not legal.

Post Reply