New Purchase Advice Pls
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
New Purchase Advice Pls
Hi All
Just purchased an early 60's Minor 1000 which has been fitted with a 1098 motor and I have a couple of questions....
Firstly, at an indicated 50mph it sounds like its revving very high. What would be my diff ratio (assuming its not been changed) and what would be my best option to change it to?
Secondly, the crank is knocking quite badly. In your experiance, can I get away with changing the shells or would I need to rebuild the bottom end? I have a good used 1098 twin carb in the garage so this might also be an option but what else would I need to change, ie gearbox or gear ratio's etc....
Thx in advance....
Just purchased an early 60's Minor 1000 which has been fitted with a 1098 motor and I have a couple of questions....
Firstly, at an indicated 50mph it sounds like its revving very high. What would be my diff ratio (assuming its not been changed) and what would be my best option to change it to?
Secondly, the crank is knocking quite badly. In your experiance, can I get away with changing the shells or would I need to rebuild the bottom end? I have a good used 1098 twin carb in the garage so this might also be an option but what else would I need to change, ie gearbox or gear ratio's etc....
Thx in advance....
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
diff ratios
the standard diff ratio for your car would be 4.555-1 whereas the 1098
ratio is 4.22-1. The correct gearbox for the 1098 has a ribbed outer casing instead of the smooth case of the 948. If you uprated to complete 1098 running gear then you would need the correct speedo which, in order to retain the present look would be from a 1962-64 1098
which retained the bronze coloured face.
ratio is 4.22-1. The correct gearbox for the 1098 has a ribbed outer casing instead of the smooth case of the 948. If you uprated to complete 1098 running gear then you would need the correct speedo which, in order to retain the present look would be from a 1962-64 1098
which retained the bronze coloured face.
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7592
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire.
- MMOC Member: No
As willie has said check to see if the gearbox is ribbed if so you will just need to change the diff for a later 4.22 to reduce the revs.
As for the engine you may get away with just changing the shells it depends on if the crank is marked, it can be done with the engine in situ as the sump does come off with no problems, but personally as you dont know the history of the engine I would want to give everthing a full check over.
As for the engine you may get away with just changing the shells it depends on if the crank is marked, it can be done with the engine in situ as the sump does come off with no problems, but personally as you dont know the history of the engine I would want to give everthing a full check over.
Cheers
Kevin
Lovejoy 1968 Smoke Grey Traveller (gone to a new home after13 years)
Herts Branch Member
Moderator MMOC 44706
Kevin
Lovejoy 1968 Smoke Grey Traveller (gone to a new home after13 years)
Herts Branch Member
Moderator MMOC 44706
Thanks Guys and Hi to Phoebe
I've had a look and if I'm looking at the right things it does look like the gearbox casing is ribbed, so its just a diff change needed. Any one have any experience / thoughts on a 3.9 or 3.7 diff??
I think I'll drop the sump off and have a good look around and see if shells will sort the problem - if not I'll dust off the spare lump for now....
I'm sure there will be more questions in the future so thanks again for your help...
I've had a look and if I'm looking at the right things it does look like the gearbox casing is ribbed, so its just a diff change needed. Any one have any experience / thoughts on a 3.9 or 3.7 diff??
I think I'll drop the sump off and have a good look around and see if shells will sort the problem - if not I'll dust off the spare lump for now....
I'm sure there will be more questions in the future so thanks again for your help...
[sig]8426[/sig]
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
The 4.22 diff gives good driveability unless you spend most of your time on motorways. The 3.9 is a nice option if you do a lot of long distance main road driving, but you will notice it on hills.
A 3.7 diff with a 1098 will feel far too high ratio (to most people) and be very poor on hills but it can be used (but I wouldn't recomend it over a 3.9)
A 3.7 diff with a 1098 will feel far too high ratio (to most people) and be very poor on hills but it can be used (but I wouldn't recomend it over a 3.9)
Ray. MMOC#47368. Forum moderator.
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block
Maybe we should start an exclusive relatives club Not far from either of "Jenny's" cousins here in Nuneaton !!!
Thanks Ray for the ratio advice - so, I guess my next question is.... Does any one have a decent 4.22 or 3.9 diff going spare and just begging to be used?
Fingers crossed
Thanks Ray for the ratio advice - so, I guess my next question is.... Does any one have a decent 4.22 or 3.9 diff going spare and just begging to be used?
Fingers crossed
[sig]8426[/sig]
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
3.9 and 3.7 diffs are expensive! Check your ratio before rushing in to changing the diff. If the crank has been 'knocking' for any time at all - new shells will be money down the drain. It needs crank grind and a new oil-pump. If the other engine is in good order - use it. You should probbaly use the flywheel and clutch you have now - and of course you don't 'have' to run it on twin carbs unless you want the extra power and petrol consumption!
OK, so now I'm confused!!!
Filler is on the diff casing at the rear - not on the diff itself... I marked the prop and the wheel and carefully counted the number of turns and for 8 full wheel revs I got 17 turns of the prop - so that makes it something like a 2.22:1 ratio (I think not). So I guess I'm measuring wrong somewhere - any ideas??
Filler is on the diff casing at the rear - not on the diff itself... I marked the prop and the wheel and carefully counted the number of turns and for 8 full wheel revs I got 17 turns of the prop - so that makes it something like a 2.22:1 ratio (I think not). So I guess I'm measuring wrong somewhere - any ideas??
[sig]8426[/sig]
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
- Location: Burnley
- MMOC Member: No
I make that 17/(8/2) = 4.25, so it will be a 4.22 diff.
Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
- Location: Burnley
- MMOC Member: No
When one wheel is fixed, the diff makes the free one turn twice as fast.
Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.
Ah yes, of course - I was forgetting that part of its job!
So anyway - still think it's revving too high and I seem to have the correct box and diff in so I will try to rig uo a rev counter and see what it actually is doing.... or maybe its been too long since I drove an old car and am forgetting what they are like???
So anyway - still think it's revving too high and I seem to have the correct box and diff in so I will try to rig uo a rev counter and see what it actually is doing.... or maybe its been too long since I drove an old car and am forgetting what they are like???
[sig]8426[/sig]
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Compare the Minors - Simples !! http://mog.myfreeforum.org/index.php
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
- Location: Burnley
- MMOC Member: No
I suspect it's just a matter of getting used to the sound. I have the same setup and I often cruise at about 60-65 for several hours at a time. It might be worth checking the speedometer against a GPS though in case it is reading low.
Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.