Road Height

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
SUE482
Minor Fan
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:20 pm
Location: In the Middle
MMOC Member: Yes

Road Height

Post by SUE482 »

It's some years now since I completed a full refurbishment on my 1955 2 door saloon and it struck me the other day she was looking a bit low on the back end compared to others I see around. On the refurbishment I re-used the original 7 leaf rear springs and torsion bars, just replaced the bushes and plates. When I checked the road height distances they were more than an inch lower at the rear end, OK at the front, than that shown in the alignment diagram R16 of the workshop manual which tends to suggest that the rear springs may require replacing although it does say that the important aspect is the vertical datum points to each other not the actual ground height.
Of course the other thing which may effect the road height are the tyres and I have radials 155/80R's fitted although as the front road height seems OK then perhaps I can discount this.

Back to the the R16 diagram this is for a Morris Minor Series MM, can anyone tell me if these dimensions are applicable to all years and models or are there further diagrams listed somewhere?

Now if I do need to renew, do I fit 5 leaf which were used later in the production run or 7 leaf as fitted to the traveller, any advice please.
Should be ready for tea time.
User avatar
ndevans
Minor Legend
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Bristol, England
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by ndevans »

I believe the same diagram is in the BMC workshop manual, I have a 1968 copy, which covers all models up to the 1098's. That implies to me that the same diagram is applicable to all models, though I would expect a slightly different ride height between different models due to differing weights.
cheers N

Image
33063, Eridge, Sept 2021 by Neil Evans, on Flickr
'69 Traveller, 1275, discs.
User avatar
geoberni
Minor Legend
Posts: 3563
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:19 am
Location: North Leicestershire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by geoberni »

That's certainly the only dimensions diagram. I have the 1970, 14th edition manual and nothing changed in that. :wink:
Basil the 1955 series II

Image
ianmack
Minor Addict
Posts: 835
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:02 pm
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by ianmack »

If you fit new springs it is advisable to use five leaf ones in a saloon unless you carry extreme weights.

There seems to be a problem at the moment with quality control in replacement springs, a pair I fitted recently being unpleasantly hard, for example. If your car rides ok I wouldn’t replace the springs just for looking low.
philthehill
Minor Maniac
Posts: 10767
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:05 pm
Location: Hampshire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by philthehill »

The height diagram is relative to all Morris Minors and not any particular model even though the diagram states MM. There was no revised drawing produced by BMC or BL. There were very few differences if any in the floor pan especially suspension anchorage points during production.
img185.jpg
img185.jpg (1.06 MiB) Viewed 1234 times
Personally If the rear suspension is not bottoming out I would leave well alone.

Sleeper
Minor Legend
Posts: 1045
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:18 pm
Location: Manchester ( Damp and Miserable ) and that's just the wife...
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by Sleeper »

Maybe we could have a poll ,measuring ground level to top centre of the wheel-arches , unladen ?

Just to start it off...
Front 649mm
Rear 629mm

John :wink:
philthehill
Minor Maniac
Posts: 10767
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:05 pm
Location: Hampshire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by philthehill »

Only if you are measuring factory fitted wings have you any hope of getting the same measurement.

User avatar
ndevans
Minor Legend
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Bristol, England
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by ndevans »

Even then I don't think you'd get all the same measurements. Minors aren't built to the same standards of precision and tolerance as modern cars. Especially Travellers-the rear wings screw into the wood, I suspect a fair bit was done by eye.
cheers N

Image
33063, Eridge, Sept 2021 by Neil Evans, on Flickr
'69 Traveller, 1275, discs.
SUE482
Minor Fan
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:20 pm
Location: In the Middle
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Road Height

Post by SUE482 »

Thank you all for your help and suggestions, I may just leave it with upgrading to front discs only at this time, perhaps next :-?
Should be ready for tea time.
Post Reply