waxoil

Discuss other problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
sb
Minor Friendly
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Devon
MMOC Member: No

waxoil

Post by sb »

is it ok to waxoil the underside on top of the exsiting underseal?

or should the waxoil go first and then underseal?

Cheers, sb.
Apparently i like the Mogster more than the girlfriend!!!
Peetee
Minor Legend
Posts: 3428
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 9:20 am
Location: Southampton
MMOC Member: No

Post by Peetee »

What sort of underseal is it?. 'Underseal' can vary from a specific kind of paint to black sticky gunge like waxoyle.
You can't put anything on top of waxoyle except more waxoyle
Older and more confused than I could ever imagine possible.
Kevin
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7592
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire.
MMOC Member: No

Post by Kevin »

is it ok to waxoil the underside on top of the exsiting underseal?
If it is a wax based underseal it should not be a problem, and as Petee says waxoil only needs to be used on its own and is far better that some of the rubbery types that can flake off or go solid and worse they can perforate and retain moisture under them, what have you got at the moment.
Cheers

Kevin
Lovejoy 1968 Smoke Grey Traveller (gone to a new home after13 years)

Herts Branch Member
Moderator MMOC 44706
sb
Minor Friendly
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Devon
MMOC Member: No

Post by sb »

Kevin wrote:
is it ok to waxoil the underside on top of the exsiting underseal?
what have you got at the moment.
The car came with a thick black rubbery type however, it was cracked, split and pealing which allowed water to seap under and further its demise.
i had the underside steam cleaned and brushed on a couple of coats of carplan's tetroseal, bloody alfull job, globs of it my hair etc, so i can't help thinking that in the more hard to reach areas the cover may not be that good. Indeed I suspect another coat would be good although i'm curious whether a covering of waxoil would improve the situation.

Cheers, sb.
Apparently i like the Mogster more than the girlfriend!!!
Chris Morley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Berkshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Chris Morley »

[/quote]"awful job, globs of it my hair etc", [quote]

It's one of the rites of passage for all Minor owners, along with globules of molten metal falling into your shirt or hair! :-?
sb
Minor Friendly
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Devon
MMOC Member: No

Post by sb »

Chris Morley wrote:
"awful job, globs of it my hair etc",

It's one of the rites of passage for all Minor owners, along with globules of molten metal falling into your shirt or hair! :-?
So the rocks are still hot :o yet the required effect is somewhat different...ahh getting older.
Apparently i like the Mogster more than the girlfriend!!!
Peetee
Minor Legend
Posts: 3428
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 9:20 am
Location: Southampton
MMOC Member: No

Post by Peetee »

Waxoyle has one big advantage over brush on underseal. If done correctly it creeps into spaces. The crossmember on many Minors is a steel pressing. It's folded over on itself so there is a gap inside the member. Ideal for trapping air and moisture next to bare metal. Waxoyle has a better chance of creeping in there and stopping the thing decaying faster that you can say "terminal axle tramp". Because of the construction of the Minor there are many such 'rust traps' which, with a propper treatment do not become a problem, but left bare will cost you mega ££.
Older and more confused than I could ever imagine possible.
Post Reply